I’d post a pic but then you’d all get green jealous fever and die. I’d rather Winamp use RAM than not – it’s faster.Īs for Foobar (which I use for some maintenance purposes, and nothing against the program at all), IMO, it’s got nothing on what Winamp can do in terms of customisation, addons, and skins. If it had to load/catalog a 1.4 million songs it’d be a different story, If it had to load a 30k playlist, again, more overhead and so on. I just opened Foobar, with nothing in it and its sitting at 10MB of RAM. Are you the same person is said the same silly things in the last Winamp article here. And my computer probably doesn’t even realize the its CPU was needed. pics to follow) doesn’t even raise the temp – of anything. Thrashing my sound system while I drown some beers and run around the house with my pants on my head, for five hours (last night was fun. It’s also not bare bones – I have some plugins added and skin). Winamp uses 230-250MB of RAM when opened and when in use (120Mb of that is the media library’s main.dat sql catalog file of my music). I have a quarter million mp3 library, I have a 30,000 playlist. If it chewed thru large amounts of CPU, then that would be an issue – but it doesn’t.
0 kommentar(er)
